M&A Integration Executive
AI recommendation signal analysis across 157 domains for the M&A Integration Executive persona in HR Consulting.
Many tables and charts on this page show only the top few results; the full data behind them runs far deeper. The complete report unlocks every row, chart, and download for this industry.
Get the full HR Consulting report →How to use this page
Compare channels at a glance
See which domains win each discovery channel, and where a brand is strong in one but missing from another. Use the over- and under-performer tables to find channels where competitors hold an edge you can close, or gaps you can take first.
Where the numbers come from
LLM, Fanout, and Organic columns use a rank-weighted score: a domain at position 1 counts for more than one at position 10, summed across every query run. AI Search is a plain citation count because Google's AI Overviews carry no rank data.
What's on this page
Side-by-side rankings for LLM recommendations, web-search fanout, Google's AI Overviews, and organic results, plus an aggregate view and per-channel over/under-performer callouts.
LLM vs Fanout vs AI Search vs Organic
Compare recommendation patterns for M&A Integration Executive across four channels side by side: pick a model for LLM and Fanout, toggle Google/Bing for Organic. AI Search has no model choice (it's Google's own AI Overview, a single source, not a multi-model API) and no rank field, so it's shown as a plain citation count rather than a rank-weighted score like the other three.
The two boxes below the four channel charts offer several views of the same data; use the tabs to switch charts. Every view derives from the four charts' data directly, normalized 0-100 within each channel, and updates with the same dropdowns.
Pure LLM: Over- vs. Under-performers
For M&A Integration Executive, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Pure LLM than they do on average across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Pure LLM.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| willistowerswatson.com | 82 | - | - | - | +82 |
| kornferry.com | 77 | 33 | - | - | +65 |
| pwc.com | 65 | 0 | 22 | - | +57 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mergerintegration.com | - | - | 94 | 88 | -61 |
| landrumhr.com | - | - | 83 | 91 | -58 |
| rsmus.com | - | - | 61 | 94 | -52 |
Fanout: Over- vs. Under-performers
For M&A Integration Executive, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Fanout than they do on average across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Fanout.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deloitte.com | 71 | 67 | 0 | 21 | +36 |
| kpmg.com | 53 | 44 | - | - | +27 |
| wtwco.com | 88 | 78 | 17 | 49 | +27 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mergerintegration.com | - | - | 94 | 88 | -61 |
| landrumhr.com | - | - | 83 | 91 | -58 |
| rsmus.com | - | - | 61 | 94 | -52 |
Google AI Overview: Over- vs. Under-performers
For M&A Integration Executive, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Google AI Overview than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Google AI Overview.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| youtube.com | - | - | 100 | - | +100 |
| mergerintegration.com | - | - | 94 | 88 | +65 |
| landrumhr.com | - | - | 83 | 91 | +53 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ey.com | 59 | 56 | - | 79 | -64 |
| wtwco.com | 88 | 78 | 17 | 49 | -55 |
| deloitte.com | 71 | 67 | 0 | 21 | -53 |
Organic Google: Over- vs. Under-performers
For M&A Integration Executive, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Organic Google than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Organic Google.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bcg.com | 24 | - | 6 | 100 | +90 |
| thinkglobal-hr.com | - | - | - | 82 | +82 |
| rsmus.com | - | - | 61 | 94 | +74 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kornferry.com | 77 | 33 | - | - | -37 |
| youtube.com | - | - | 100 | - | -33 |
| kpmg.com | 53 | 44 | - | - | -33 |