If you are reviewing Peec AI, you need a tracking arrangement that fits the questions and reporting schedule your team uses. Peec AI prices a fixed prompt count running daily against three chosen models. Teams look for alternatives when they need more prompts or models, or when daily collection is more frequent than their reporting requires.
OppAlerts publishes this page and is one of the alternatives on it. Its prompt reporting is thinner than the Peec reports described below.
Work out which of those applies first. Each of the products below solves a different one, and the amounts are not comparable until you hold prompts, models and frequency the same across a quote.
Rankscale, when daily is the wrong frequency
Rankscale meters credits rather than a prompt allowance, and publishes the calculation: 50 prompts at 0.75 credits a run, weekly, is 162.5 credits a month. Scheduling runs from hourly to monthly on every plan, and unused credits roll over up to a stated multiple of the monthly allocation instead of expiring.
That structure suits an uneven month. A launch week can run hourly and the rest of the quarter monthly, from one allocation. Under Peec's model the frequency is fixed at daily and the prompt count is what you buy.
Seats are unlimited and uncharged, as they are at Peec, so moving does not cost you access for the wider team. Rankscale's query fanout report is unusually detailed, listing coverage, probed domains and an all-queries table. Read it as the searches the engine reports it would run, which is not the same as proof of what it privately executed.
Profound, when the deliverable is a content program
Profound tracks a longer engine list, naming ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Copilot, Grok and DeepSeek, with up to nine on Enterprise. It includes two features absent from the other products listed here. Agent Analytics reads AI crawler activity from your own Cloudflare, AWS or Vercel logs. Agents uses a topic and a brand kit to generate briefs and full drafts that publish to your CMS.
Check the plan boundaries before assuming it is an upgrade. Starter tracks 50 prompts against ChatGPT alone with one seat. Growth tracks 100 prompts across three engines with three seats. Peec's unlimited users are a real loss in that move. Profound's API is Enterprise only, where Peec provides one on its published plans.
Neither Profound page read states what one Agents credit buys, and the plans include 100 and 400 a month. Ask before treating that allowance as a number of articles.
Scrunch, when the website itself needs auditing
Scrunch's Core plan is $250 a month for 125 unique prompts, four engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Copilot), one brand workspace, five user licenses and five site audits a month. Its Agent Experience modules cover Content Delivery, Agent Traffic and Site Diagnostics, so the product acts on your own site as well as measuring answers.
Core also caps things Peec does not visibly cap: one country, two languages, three personas, five competitors. If you track a brand across several markets, Scrunch pushes that to Enterprise, along with the nine-engine list, API access and SSO.
Otterly.AI, when you want four engines on a small plan
Otterly lists ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot on all three self-serve plans, at 15, 100 and 400 search prompts for $29, $189 and $489 a month. Engine count is not a plan boundary, so a small team gets the full engine list on the cheapest plan and pays only for prompt volume. Extra prompts are sold in blocks of 100.
Its enterprise line starts at $1,000 a month and meters GEO audits, API requests, MCP requests and Agent Analytics events. If you want MCP access with a published request allowance rather than a sales conversation, Otterly is the one product here that prices it openly.
OppAlerts, when the prompt set is one input among several
OppAlerts tracks a shorter engine list than any other option here: ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Mode for prompts, Google and Bing for keywords. Perplexity and Claude are not available. If model breadth is why you are leaving Peec, choose Profound or Scrunch instead.
Its allowance is counted in calls rather than prompts, so the prompt count is not what you buy. One call is one tracked item, on one provider, on one day, and you tick which days you want fresh data on. A team with 400 prompts checked twice a week across three providers spends 2,400 calls, and the same prompt set would exceed Peec's largest published prompt allowance.
What it adds is research normally bought through other subscriptions, using the same campaign definition:
- A backlink database and link gap report.
- A prospect index searched by meaning for guest contribution pages, resource lists, roundups, podcasts and directories.
- Stored public contact details for a site.
- A news and blog index.
- Monthly PageRank history, and a content optimizer that compares a draft you wrote with categories you select and lists phrases it does not contain.
It does not score prompt demand, classify prompt intent, report brand attributes or sentiment, or list sponsored placements in answers. Those are Peec reports with no equivalent here.
Matching the reason to the product
| Why Peec stopped fitting | Look at |
|---|---|
| Daily collection costs more than it is worth | Rankscale, scheduled hourly to monthly with rollover |
| Three models is too few | Profound or Scrunch Enterprise for the longest engine lists |
| Full engine list needed at low cost | Otterly.AI, four engines on every self-serve plan |
| Several countries or languages | Profound or Scrunch, both selling regions and languages explicitly |
| Your own site needs auditing too | Scrunch, for site diagnostics and crawler traffic |
| Drafts have to be produced, not only recommended | Profound Agents |
| Published API and MCP allowances | Otterly.AI |
| Prospects, coverage, contacts and keyword positions as well | OppAlerts |
Before comparing any two quotes, fix the prompt count, the engine list and the run frequency, then ask each vendor what that costs. The arithmetic differs enough between these meters that the cheapest headline plan is often not the cheapest for the work. How to compare AI search tool costs sets out the method.
Compare alternatives using the same prompts, providers and desired frequency. That lets you judge the cost and report coverage against your review process.
For the two-product version, see OppAlerts and Peec AI compared.