Staffing Agencies
AI recommendation signal analysis across 2,267 domains and 11 buyer personas in Staffing Agencies, led by randstadusa.com as the most LLM-recommended domain.
Many tables and charts on this page show only the top few results; the full data behind them runs far deeper. The complete report unlocks every row, chart, and download for this industry.
Get the full Staffing Agencies report →How to use this page
Compare channels at a glance
See which domains win each discovery channel, and where a brand is strong in one but missing from another. Use the over- and under-performer tables to find channels where competitors hold an edge you can close, or gaps you can take first.
Where the numbers come from
LLM, Fanout, and Organic columns use a rank-weighted score: a domain at position 1 counts for more than one at position 10, summed across every query run. AI Search is a plain citation count because Google's AI Overviews carry no rank data.
What's on this page
Side-by-side rankings for LLM recommendations, web-search fanout, Google's AI Overviews, and organic results, plus an aggregate view and per-channel over/under-performer callouts.
LLM vs Fanout vs AI Search vs Organic
Compare recommendation patterns for Staffing Agencies across all personas across four channels side by side: pick a model for LLM and Fanout, toggle Google/Bing for Organic. AI Search has no model choice (it's Google's own AI Overview, a single source, not a multi-model API) and no rank field, so it's shown as a plain citation count rather than a rank-weighted score like the other three.
The two boxes below the four channel charts offer several views of the same data; use the tabs to switch charts. Every view derives from the four charts' data directly, normalized 0-100 within each channel, and updates with the same dropdowns.
Pure LLM: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Staffing Agencies, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Pure LLM than they do on average across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Pure LLM.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adeccousa.com | 95 | - | - | - | +95 |
| manpower.com | 92 | - | - | - | +92 |
| adeccogroup.com | 87 | - | - | - | +87 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| adp.com | - | - | 100 | 100 | -66 |
| forbes.com | - | - | 98 | 99 | -66 |
| ibm.com | - | - | 98 | 98 | -65 |
Fanout: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Staffing Agencies, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Fanout than they do on average across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Fanout.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| toptal.com | 96 | 93 | - | - | +61 |
| employbridge.com | 88 | 87 | - | - | +57 |
| mavericksondemand.com | 68 | 80 | - | - | +57 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scionstaffing.com | 76 | - | 74 | 84 | -78 |
| huntclub.com | 84 | - | 81 | 62 | -76 |
| instawork.com | 20 | - | 95 | 87 | -67 |
Google AI Overview: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Staffing Agencies, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Google AI Overview than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Google AI Overview.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bespokepartners.com | - | - | 89 | - | +89 |
| somewhere.com | - | - | 87 | - | +87 |
| paycor.com | - | - | 79 | - | +79 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kellyservices.com | 94 | 85 | - | 97 | -92 |
| remote.com | 92 | 81 | 3 | 93 | -86 |
| lhh.com | 73 | 78 | - | 91 | -81 |
Organic Google: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Staffing Agencies, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Organic Google than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Organic Google.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| thrivas.com | - | - | - | 99 | +99 |
| tempstaffinginc.com | - | - | - | 98 | +98 |
| impactstaffing.com | - | - | - | 97 | +97 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| teksystems.com | 99 | 96 | 69 | - | -88 |
| toptal.com | 96 | 93 | - | - | -63 |
| bettsrecruiting.com | 97 | - | 82 | - | -60 |