No. OppAlerts does not audit websites. It never crawls your site, and it looks at none of the things an audit looks at: broken links, redirect chains, duplicate content, indexation problems, page speed, structured data errors. If you are responsible for technical SEO, plan for a separate audit tool in your workflow.
Use one of these instead
Site auditing is a crowded category and you have good options. Semrush, SE Ranking, Ahrefs and Serpstat all include it, at 250,000 to 2,000,000 pages a month depending on the plan. Dedicated crawlers go deeper again.
If technical SEO is part of your job you need one of those, and nothing here replaces it.
Why it is absent and not planned
This product looks at the web beyond your site. Where you could appear, who is discussing your market, what the answers say about you, whether a draft reads as being about what you meant. Your own site's technical condition is a different problem, and it already has mature tools solving it well.
The one place people get confused
Content Optimizer reads text you paste in and compares its meaning against a category you picked. It checks writing, not markup.
It never fetches a URL. It looks at no markup, no headings, no links, no speed, no crawlability. Paste a page's text in and you learn whether the writing reads as being about the subject you intended. Whether the page can be crawled is a separate question and this will not answer it.
Where the two products do not overlap
It finds placements by opportunity type, returns the contact details sites publish, and compares link profiles against competitors you name. It also monitors coverage, tracks AI answers, and checks drafts against audience or city categories.
Most teams doing this work seriously end up paying for both. Normal outcome, and not a failure to consolidate.
When planning technical checks, assign them to a tool that examines the site. Keep that audit available alongside any OppAlerts research your team uses.
See what OppAlerts can replace or OppAlerts and SEO platforms.