Scientific Instruments
AI recommendation signal analysis across 1,063 domains and 11 buyer personas in Scientific Instruments, led by thermofisher.com as the most LLM-recommended domain.
Many tables and charts on this page show only the top few results; the full data behind them runs far deeper. The complete report unlocks every row, chart, and download for this industry.
Get the full Scientific Instruments report →How to use this page
Compare channels at a glance
See which domains win each discovery channel, and where a brand is strong in one but missing from another. Use the over- and under-performer tables to find channels where competitors hold an edge you can close, or gaps you can take first.
Where the numbers come from
LLM, Fanout, and Organic columns use a rank-weighted score: a domain at position 1 counts for more than one at position 10, summed across every query run. AI Search is a plain citation count because Google's AI Overviews carry no rank data.
What's on this page
Side-by-side rankings for LLM recommendations, web-search fanout, Google's AI Overviews, and organic results, plus an aggregate view and per-channel over/under-performer callouts.
LLM vs Fanout vs AI Search vs Organic
Compare recommendation patterns for Scientific Instruments across all personas across four channels side by side: pick a model for LLM and Fanout, toggle Google/Bing for Organic. AI Search has no model choice (it's Google's own AI Overview, a single source, not a multi-model API) and no rank field, so it's shown as a plain citation count rather than a rank-weighted score like the other three.
The two boxes below the four channel charts offer several views of the same data; use the tabs to switch charts. Every view derives from the four charts' data directly, normalized 0-100 within each channel, and updates with the same dropdowns.
Pure LLM: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Scientific Instruments, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Pure LLM than they do on average across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Pure LLM.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| roche.com | 96 | - | - | - | +96 |
| diagnostics.siemens-healthineers.com | 83 | - | - | - | +83 |
| abbott.com | 80 | - | - | - | +80 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| en.wikipedia.org | - | - | 100 | 100 | -67 |
| youtube.com | - | - | 100 | 98 | -66 |
| labequipmentdirect.com | - | - | 98 | 99 | -66 |
Fanout: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Scientific Instruments, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Fanout than they do on average across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Fanout.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| heidolph-instruments.com | 74 | 93 | - | - | +68 |
| questpair.com | 50 | 67 | - | - | +50 |
| metrohm.com | 89 | 94 | 17 | 34 | +48 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bio-rad.com | 90 | 0 | 91 | 93 | -91 |
| beckmancoulter.com | 82 | - | 90 | 97 | -90 |
| newlifescientific.com | 38 | - | 95 | 87 | -73 |
Google AI Overview: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Scientific Instruments, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Google AI Overview than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Google AI Overview.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bico.com | - | - | 94 | - | +94 |
| microlit.us | - | - | 93 | - | +93 |
| ziprecruiter.com | - | - | 88 | 17 | +82 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| siemens-healthineers.com | 85 | 69 | - | 78 | -77 |
| eppendorf.com | 84 | 41 | - | 92 | -72 |
| benchmarkscientific.com | 57 | 78 | - | 66 | -67 |
Organic Google: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Scientific Instruments, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Organic Google than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Organic Google.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fisheramerican.com | - | - | - | 98 | +98 |
| automata.tech | - | - | - | 97 | +97 |
| amscope.com | - | - | - | 96 | +96 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sciex.com | 65 | 70 | 71 | - | -69 |
| endress.com | 92 | 63 | 50 | - | -68 |
| heidolph-instruments.com | 74 | 93 | - | - | -56 |