Private Equity CMO
AI recommendation signal analysis across 684 domains for the Private Equity CMO persona in Media Buying Agencies.
Many tables and charts on this page show only the top few results; the full data behind them runs far deeper. The complete report unlocks every row, chart, and download for this industry.
Get the full Media Buying Agencies report →How to use this page
Compare channels at a glance
See which domains win each discovery channel, and where a brand is strong in one but missing from another. Use the over- and under-performer tables to find channels where competitors hold an edge you can close, or gaps you can take first.
Where the numbers come from
LLM, Fanout, and Organic columns use a rank-weighted score: a domain at position 1 counts for more than one at position 10, summed across every query run. AI Search is a plain citation count because Google's AI Overviews carry no rank data.
What's on this page
Side-by-side rankings for LLM recommendations, web-search fanout, Google's AI Overviews, and organic results, plus an aggregate view and per-channel over/under-performer callouts.
LLM vs Fanout vs AI Search vs Organic
Compare recommendation patterns for Private Equity CMO across four channels side by side: pick a model for LLM and Fanout, toggle Google/Bing for Organic. AI Search has no model choice (it's Google's own AI Overview, a single source, not a multi-model API) and no rank field, so it's shown as a plain citation count rather than a rank-weighted score like the other three.
The two boxes below the four channel charts offer several views of the same data; use the tabs to switch charts. Every view derives from the four charts' data directly, normalized 0-100 within each channel, and updates with the same dropdowns.
Pure LLM: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Private Equity CMO, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Pure LLM than they do on average across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Pure LLM.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reforge.com | 98 | - | - | - | +98 |
| madisonlogic.com | 90 | - | - | - | +90 |
| metricmarketing.com | 88 | - | - | - | +88 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gogreymatter.com | - | - | 100 | 95 | -65 |
| percepture.com | - | - | 87 | 100 | -62 |
| spinutech.com | - | - | 93 | 84 | -59 |
Fanout: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Private Equity CMO, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Fanout than they do on average across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Fanout.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| powerdigitalmarketing.com | 95 | 100 | - | 4 | +67 |
| refinelabs.com | 93 | 78 | - | - | +47 |
| bluetext.com | 42 | 56 | - | - | +42 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gogreymatter.com | - | - | 100 | 95 | -65 |
| percepture.com | - | - | 87 | 100 | -62 |
| spinutech.com | - | - | 93 | 84 | -59 |
Google AI Overview: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Private Equity CMO, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Google AI Overview than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Google AI Overview.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| marketingltb.com | - | - | 80 | - | +80 |
| gogreymatter.com | - | - | 100 | 95 | +68 |
| spinutech.com | - | - | 93 | 84 | +65 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| directiveconsulting.com | 100 | 89 | - | 75 | -88 |
| powerdigitalmarketing.com | 95 | 100 | - | 4 | -66 |
| refinelabs.com | 93 | 78 | - | - | -57 |
Organic Google: Over- vs. Under-performers
For Private Equity CMO, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Organic Google than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Organic Google.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| campaignlive.com | - | - | - | 98 | +98 |
| adage.com | - | - | - | 97 | +97 |
| axial.net | - | - | - | 91 | +91 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| powerdigitalmarketing.com | 95 | 100 | - | 4 | -62 |
| refinelabs.com | 93 | 78 | - | - | -57 |
| obilityb2b.com | 81 | 67 | - | - | -49 |