GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors
AI recommendation signal analysis across 742 domains and 11 buyer personas in GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors, led by nvidia.com as the most LLM-recommended domain.
Many tables and charts on this page show only the top few results; the full data behind them runs far deeper. The complete report unlocks every row, chart, and download for this industry.
Get the full GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors report →How to use this page
Compare channels at a glance
See which domains win each discovery channel, and where a brand is strong in one but missing from another. Use the over- and under-performer tables to find channels where competitors hold an edge you can close, or gaps you can take first.
Where the numbers come from
LLM, Fanout, and Organic columns use a rank-weighted score: a domain at position 1 counts for more than one at position 10, summed across every query run. AI Search is a plain citation count because Google's AI Overviews carry no rank data.
What's on this page
Side-by-side rankings for LLM recommendations, web-search fanout, Google's AI Overviews, and organic results, plus an aggregate view and per-channel over/under-performer callouts.
LLM vs Fanout vs AI Search vs Organic
Compare recommendation patterns for GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors across all personas across four channels side by side: pick a model for LLM and Fanout, toggle Google/Bing for Organic. AI Search has no model choice (it's Google's own AI Overview, a single source, not a multi-model API) and no rank field, so it's shown as a plain citation count rather than a rank-weighted score like the other three.
The two boxes below the four channel charts offer several views of the same data; use the tabs to switch charts. Every view derives from the four charts' data directly, normalized 0-100 within each channel, and updates with the same dropdowns.
Pure LLM: Over- vs. Under-performers
For GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Pure LLM than they do on average across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Fanout, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Pure LLM.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| replicate.com | 87 | 23 | - | - | +79 |
| purestorage.com | 73 | - | - | - | +73 |
| gigabyte.com | 72 | - | - | - | +72 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reddit.com | - | - | 99 | 100 | -66 |
| gmicloud.ai | - | - | 98 | 98 | -66 |
| en.wikipedia.org | - | - | 96 | 99 | -65 |
Fanout: Over- vs. Under-performers
For GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Fanout than they do on average across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Google AI Overview, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Fanout.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hosted.ai | 65 | 77 | - | - | +55 |
| delltechnologies.com | 80 | 75 | - | - | +48 |
| saturncloud.io | 56 | 64 | - | - | +45 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| equinix.com | 78 | - | 93 | 95 | -89 |
| digitalocean.com | 51 | - | 95 | 99 | -82 |
| scalecomputing.com | 50 | - | 87 | 99 | -78 |
Google AI Overview: Over- vs. Under-performers
For GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Google AI Overview than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Organic Google but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Google AI Overview.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| finance.yahoo.com | - | - | 89 | - | +89 |
| research.ibm.com | - | - | 86 | - | +86 |
| slurm.schedmd.com | - | - | 80 | - | +80 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amd.com | 90 | 72 | - | 87 | -83 |
| cisco.com | 83 | 53 | - | 98 | -78 |
| together.ai | 73 | 36 | - | 89 | -66 |
Organic Google: Over- vs. Under-performers
For GPU AI Infrastructure Vendors, domains ranked by percentile rank within each channel (100 = top domain in that channel, 0 = present but ranked last, a dash = never appeared in that channel's results at all). Over-performers (left) rank far better in Organic Google than they do on average across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview. Under-performers (right) are the mirror case: domains that do well across Pure LLM, Fanout, and Google AI Overview but rank poorly, or don't appear at all, in Organic Google.
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sovereignaiinfrastructure.com | - | - | - | 95 | +95 |
| ekwb.com | - | - | - | 93 | +93 |
| c3.ai | - | - | - | 93 | +93 |
| Domain | LLM | Fanout | AI Overview | Organic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| microsoft.com | 86 | 62 | 67 | - | -72 |
| lambdalabs.com | 74 | - | 84 | - | -53 |
| delltechnologies.com | 80 | 75 | - | - | -51 |